Barber, Ros. 2021.
“Big Data or Not Enough? Zeta Test Reliability and the Attribution of Henry VI.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36 (3): 542–64.
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaa041.
Burrows, John. 2007.
“All the Way Through: Testing for Authorship in Different Frequency Strata.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 22 (1): 27–47.
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqi067.
Craig, Hugh, and Arthur F. Kinney. 2009. Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship. Cambridge University Press.
Diwersy, Sascha, Laetitia Gonon, Vannina Goossens, Olivier Kraif, Iva Novakova, Julie Sorba, and Ilaria Vidotto. 2021.
“La phraséologie du roman contemporain dans les corpus et les applications de la PhraseoBase.” Corpus, no. 22.
https://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.6101.
Du, Keli, Julia Dudar, Cora Rok, and Christof Schöch. 2021. “Zeta & Eta: An Exploration and Evaluation of Two Dispersion-based Measures of Distinctiveness.” In Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Humanities Research 2021, edited by Maud Ehrmann, Folgert Karsdorp, Melvin Wevers, Tara Lee Andrews, Manuel Burghardt, Mike Kestemont, Enrique Manjavacas, Michael Piotrowski, and Joris van Zundert, 2989:181–94. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: CEUR.
———. 2022.
“Kontrastive Textanalyse mit pydistinto - Ein Python-Paket zur Nutzung unterschiedlicher Distinktivitätsmaße.” Potsdam:
Zenodo.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6327967.
Du, Keli, Julia Dudar, and Christof Schöch. 2022.
“Evaluation of Measures of Distinctiveness. Classification of Literary Texts on the Basis of Distinctive Words.” Journal of Computational Literary Studies 1 (1).
https://doi.org/10.48694/jcls.102.
Egbert, Jesse, and Doug Biber. 2019.
“Incorporating Text Dispersion into Keyword Analyses.” Corpora 14 (1): 77–104.
https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2019.0162.
Evert, Stephanie. 2022.
“Measuring Keyness.” In
Book of Abstracts of the Digital Humanities 2022.
Tokyo:
ADHO.
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CY6MW.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2008.
“Dispersions and Adjusted Frequencies in Corpora.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13 (4): 403–37.
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri.
———. 2019.
“15 Years of Collostructions: Some Long Overdue Additions/Corrections (to/of Actually All Sorts of Corpus-Linguistics Measures).” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24 (3): 385–412.
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00011.gri.
———. 2021.
“What Do (Most of) Our Dispersion Measures Measure (Most)? Dispersion?” November.
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.21029.gri.
Hoover, David L. 2010. “Teasing Out Authorship and Style with t-Tests and Zeta.” In Digital Humanities Conference. London.
———. 2022.
“Zeta Revisited.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 37 (4): 1002–21.
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab095.
Kraif, Olivier, and Agnès Tutin. 2017.
“Des motifs séquentiels aux motifs hiérarchiques : l’apport des arbres lexico-syntaxiques récurrents pour le repérage des routines discursives.” Corpus, no. 17 (January).
https://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.2889.
Lijffijt, Jefrey, Terttu Nevalainen, Tanja Säily, Panagiotis Papapetrou, Kai Puolamäki, and Heikki Mannila. 2014.
“Significance Testing of Word Frequencies in Corpora.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 31 (2): 374–97.
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu064.
Rizvi, Pervez. 2019a.
“An Improvement to Zeta.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 34 (2): 419–22.
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy039.
———. 2019b.
“The Interpretation of Zeta Test Results.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 34 (2): 401–18.
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy038.
———. 2022.
“The Interpretation of Zeta Test Results: A Supplement.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 37 (4): 1172–78.
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac011.
Schöch, Christof. 2018. “Zeta für die kontrastive Analyse literarischer Texte. Theorie, Implementierung, Fallstudie.” In Quantitative Ansätze in den Literatur- und Geisteswissenschaften. Systematische und historische Perspektiven, edited by Toni Bernhart, Sandra Richter, Marcus Lepper, Marcus Willand, and Andrea Albrecht, 77–94. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Schöch, Christof, Daniel Schlör, Albin Zehe, Henning Gebhard, Martin Becker, and Andreas Hotho. 2018. “Burrows : Exploring and Evaluating Variants and .” In Book of Abstracts of the Digital Humanities Conference. Mexico City: ADHO.
Schröter, Julian, Keli Du, Julia Dudar, Cora Rok, and Christof Schöch. 2021.
“From Keyness to Distinctiveness Triangulation and Evaluation in Computational Literary Studies.” Journal of Literary Theory 15 (1-2): 81–108.
https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2021-2011.
Scott, Mike. 1997.
“PC Analysis of Key Words And Key Key Words.” System 25 (2): 233–45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00011-0.
Weidman, Sean G., and James O’Sullivan. 2018. “The Limits of Distinctive Words: Re-evaluating Literature’s Gender Marker Debate.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 33 (2): 374–90.